Morphology

The continental shelves are underlain by thick sequences of sedimentary rock whose structural pattern may be very complex. Tectonic, depositional, and erosional modifications can lead to a variety of margin types. Discussion and development of models for analysis of continental margins has been confused and controversial because some writers have based their classification scheme on the manner of rock emplacement, some on the origin of the surface features, and some used structural development of the margin as the basis for classification. If the factors involved in origin and modifications of the margin are separated, better discussion and understanding can develop. A logical sequence of questions can be posed: Discussion of modification of the continental margins revolves around whether the dominant process in shaping the margin was depositional or erosional and the effect of local tectonics. In the following discussion, the features described are common to both convergent and divergent margins, but because the pattern of subsidence of a wider divergent margin leads to better development, they are discussed in the divergent margin section. In simple form, we can divide the margins into:

Continental Shelves

The distinction between different types of platforms is based upon their relationship to nearby landmasses. Platforms that are next to a major landmass and owe their origin to the existence of that landmass are classified as either shelves or ramps. The environments that can occur along the shelf margins are constrained primarily by sediment supply and wave energy. Shelves exhibit a noticeable break in declivity from a gentler slope near shore to one that is much steeper beyond the shelf break.

Roll-over shelves have margins along which a gradual but definite slope break occurs. Limited reefs can occur, but are generally discouraged by active sediment movement. Sand bodies are generally localized along the slope break, but can occur across a wide geographical area. Rimmed margins are those along which elevated topographic highs exist. The most common among these in modern tropical seas are reefs. Reefs can be the primary cause of the slope break or they may occur on antecedent highs.

The term "ramp" was proposed by Ahr 1973 as an alternative to the shelf model. Ramps have no distinct slope break and facies grade evenly from sandier sediments associated with higher energy at the shallow end of the system to muddier sediments in lower-energy, deeper-water environments. The distinction between the two margin types is often subjective, and ramps can evolve into shelves if localized deposition builds a slope break.

Isolated Platforms

Banks are shoal areas in the ocean that are surrounded by deeper water. No landmass is associated with the shoal so there is no outside source of sediments. Carbonate banks generally rise from oceanic depth waters, but terrigenous banks are elevated sedimentary deposits on a continental shelf. Residual detritus reworked from the underlying mid-Tertiary formations and glacial debris are important sedimentary components on Georges Bank, Grand Banks and Nantucket Shoals. These shoals are a result of glaciation leaving moraines and outwash plains of sediment that stood above the surrounding shelf. Twichell, et al., 1981 Storms and tidal currents in these shoal areas erode fine-grained material, which is transported off the banks by current drift leaving only coarse to medium sands. On terrigenous banks, influx of sediments from outside the depositional environment is not an important factor.

Rocky banks and shoals that are remnants of bedrock rising above the general level of shelf sediments are another style of terrigenous bank. The Farallon Islands off California are accompanied by submerged rocky banks and other submerged rock banks occur off southern California, the Bering Sea, and the Barents Sea off Russia and Norway.

Isolated carbonate banks exist separate from major landmasses. These features are surrounded on all sides by water. Their generally flat tops occur in water depths from very shallow (i.e. the Bahamas Banks = 3-10 m) to depths up to 100 m (i.e. Saba Bank). Water depth over a particular bank is generally controlled by the relative ability to track the most recent rise in sea level. This is, in turn, controlled by production rates of the organisms that inhabit the platform. We loosely differentiate between shallow banks (depth less than 5-8 m) and deep-water banks (depth more than 10m), keeping in mind that these are temporally restrained distinctions (i.e. a drop in sea level will transform a deep-water bank into a shallow one).

Carbonate Platform Classification

Development of classifications for carbonate platforms is a difficult and often perplexing process. For example, the Virgin Islands Platform abuts the large landmass of Puerto Rico along its western end (i.e. an insular shelf), but supports the extensive carbonate, island/reef complex of Anegada to the east (more like a bank). Similarly, a spectrum of platform types extends northeasterly off the Honduras/Nicaragua coast, all part of the same structural element. Gorda Bank is actually a shelf, while Rosalind and Pedro Banks are truer to their names. The lesson here is that virtually no single classification scheme can adequately take into account the tremendous variability in the origin and character of carbonate platforms. The classification proposed in this book is meant to provide a convenient set of terms from which we can start to understand these features.

Only one attempt has been made to classify platform margins according to both the physical processes that have shaped them and the sedimentary patterns that result. Hine, et al. 1981 compiled a detailed classification of Bahamian margins based primarily on physical-oceanographic processes and the presence or absence of barriers to sediment transport. Their initial division is based on the relative importance of waves vs. tidal currents. Wave-dominated margins are characterized as windward (facing into the dominant approach of wave energy), or leeward (facing away). Tide-dominated margins are grouped together, regardless of orientation or physical character of the margin. The strength of this approach is its basis in quantifiable processes.

The ideal classification is one, which relies on both physical similarities in modern systems and the factors that are responsible. We prefer a classification that emphasizes physical processes and the pathways of sediment transport that are common to each margin type, drawing heavily on the ideas of Hine, et al. 1981 Their term "protected" has been modified to protecting in an attempt to better convey the nature of the process involved (i.e.. the inhibition of sediment transport by some physical barrier) and to avoid the possible misconception that "protection" by another bank or island from wave energy might be part of this process. Also, mixed banks have been added to include those platforms that are subject to cyclic changes in the influence of varying physical processes.


Wave-dominated Windward Margins

Windward margins face directly into the dominant approach of wave energy. They can be exposed to the full effect of oceanic swell (i.e. the Great Barrier Reef), or can be protected by islands or emergent reefs. The north coast of St. Croix is largely shielded from North Atlantic swell by the western Lesser Antilles. The south coast of Grand Bahama Island is partially shielded by eastern Little Bahama Bank and northern Great Bahama Bank.

An important distinction with respect to sediment transport along windward margins is the presence or absence of a major barrier to sediment transport onto and across the platform. Common barriers to sediment transport include islands (i.e. Grand Bahama Island) and emergent reefs.

Along open margins, wave-induced currents can move detrital sediment from windward reefs onto the bank. In contrast, sediment produced along protecting margins must either be incorporated within the reef itself, stored in inter-reef areas, or transported off the shelf to windward. Spur-and-groove topography (alternating intervals of reef and intervening sand channels) is common along this type of margin. Hubbard, et al. 1990 and Sadd 1984 proposed that these channels serve as short-term repositories for biologically-produced sediment during fair weather and as avenues for wholesale export during major storms. Based on storm observations made during a HYDROLAB mission in the Bahamas, Hubbard, et al. 1974 proposed that return flows triggered by water piled up by storm waves against the coast were probably the mechanism responsible. Subsequent measurements along the north coast of St. Croix during the passage of Hurricane Hugo in 1989 verified this hypothesis. Hubbard, 1992 Over two million metric tons of sediment were swept from Salt River submarine canyon on the island's north coast. Likewise, sediment collected over the previous century at nearby Cane Bay was moved off the shelf in just a few hours.

Wave-dominated Leeward Margins

These areas generally face away from the direction of greatest wave energy. Open margins are receiving areas for sediment produced on the platform top and moved by storms. These are usually characterized by extensive sand deposits , which often bury reefs that were able to flourish when sea level was lower and the updrift bank was exposed (i.e. the updrift supply of sediment was shut off). Protecting margins receive neither strong prevailing wave influence nor sediment delivered from a large, updrift bank top. Consequently, these margins are typically characterized by thin reef veneers or hardgrounds with little surficial sediment.

Tide Dominated Margins

Along most carbonate margins, tidal range is small (greater than 0.5 m). Nevertheless, tidal currents can be important locally along embayed margins with a large tidal prism or in areas where water flow is restricted. Tidal currents can also be strong in areas where the tidal wave is refracted around an isolated platform or insular shelf. Roberts, et al. 1981 measured reversing currents up to 65 cm/sec along the southwestern corner of St. Croix, despite a tidal range of less than 15 cm. This is unusual, however, and open-shelf currents are more typically on the order of 0-10 cm/sec.

In the Bahamas, tide-dominated margins are characterized by lobate sand bodies, Ball, 1967 typically occurring in en-echelon patterns that are alternately oriented bankward and off-bank . This alternating pattern results in recycling of the bank-margin sediments onto and off of the bank, with net transport being dictated by the superimposed effect of waves. The strong tidal effect at these locations is caused by the funnel-like shape of the embayment, which serves to focus tidal flow.

Mixed Margins

Along some platforms, oceanographic processes can be directionally variable. For example, the dominant direction of current flow in the eastern Java Sea, alternates between east and west in response to seasonal monsoonal patterns. Thus, the eastern and western margins of banks located there come under the alternating influence of both windward and leeward processes on an annual basis. Sediments along these margins and in the basins surrounding them will reflect the variability of these processes. For example, the off-bank sediment deposits common along leeward margins will likely be found on both sides of a mixed bank.

By combining the morphologic classification discussed at the beginning of this chapter with the more process-based ideas just discussed, one can conjure up a complete picture of a particular carbonate platform. As an example, the southern side of Little Bahama Bank would be classified as a prohibiting (island-blocked), rimmed and windward isolated-platform margin. Southwestern St. Croix is an open, leeward rollover shelf (insular).

Modifications of Shelf Geomorphology

Karst topography and reefs, relict sand bodies and glacial features all modify the physical setting to form an irregular bottom topography and produce a very different environmental setting than on open, graded shelves. Karst erosion followed by reef accretion emphasizes the topographic relief. Glacial features are both erosional and depositional in nature, and result in a strongly modified physical setting.

Glaciation

Shelves that have been modified by glaciation show marked topographic relief and continuation of glacial features associated with the adjacent landmasses. Major depressions have been gouged out of the shallow sea floor and numerous large shoals have been built by glacial deposits . The continental shelves of the northern landmasses that were covered by glaciers during the Pleistocene were shaped and influenced by these glaciers and when these shelves were flooded, these features became glacial marine deposits.

If you have a problem visualizing this terrain, visit your neighborhood golf course. Worldwide they are designed to resemble the glacial topography of Scotland where the game originated.

Glaciated shelves are distinct depositional environments that are supplied with a broad range of sediment types, characteristic of glacial sediment transport that includes very poor sorting of the sediments. The shelf sediments north of 41o North on the continental shelf of east and west North America, Europe, and Russia were mainly deposited by Pleistocene glaciers.

Karst and Reef

Many carbonate shelves were exposed during Pleistocene glaciations and were modified by ground-water solution of the limestone with the development of karst erosion surfaces. With submergence of the shelf, coral colonized the higher erosional surfaces and reef accretion accentuated the unevenness of the surface. Reef development will lead to a generally shallow shelf with numerous shoal reef areas. Shelf edge reefs in the Caribbean are examples of modern margin reef dams and accumulating sediments. The energies and depositional environments are greatly modified and the reefs allow extensive trapping of sediments between them and the coastline.

Fault Basins and Restricted Basins

The restricted basin environment is generally a deeper part of the sea floor - the antithesis of a shelf bank. The depth is increased and therefore water energies are reduced. If currents provide adequate circulation, the basin may be normally oxygenated, but if circulation is restricted, the basin may be anoxic. Reduced energy levels result in deposition of finer sediments than the surrounding sea floor and anoxic conditions lead to only planktonic shell accumulation on the floor of an anoxic basin . The importance of circulation is illustrated by the difference in the Cariaco Basin north of Venezuela and the Anegada trough in the U.S. Virgin Island Platform. The Cariaco basin has less than 600 meters of closed contours, but is anoxic (lacking in oxygen) and has been so for some time, while the Anegada Trough with more than 2000 meters of closure is oxygenated. Hubbard, et al., 19xx

Piston cores from the Cariaco Trench were taken to obtain sediments from the anoxic zone. These were grayish-olive colored fine grained, laminated silt and clay or homogeneous silty clays with a paucity of benthic fauna of Holocene age. Depauperate biota is a common and important feature of restricted environments. The diversity is low, but the number of organisms may be high. A lower zone on the south slope had yellowish-brown silty clays with a fair to good benthic fauna that were probably deposited under normal marine conditions during the late Pleistocene before the basin waters became anoxic. Athearn, 1965

Barriers may restrict circulation in a shallow water environment and develop restricted basins. The barriers may be either bathymetric physical barriers or simple limitation of water circulation. The depositional geometry may range from level bottom expanses like the Bahama Bank to complex compartmentalized environments such as Florida Bay where a lacework of individual mud lakes and islands lead to isolated and stagnant environments. The Florida bay sediments are more than 90% biomicrite with a sand component dominated by pellets, mollusc fragments and foraminifera. Ginsburg, 1956

Some modern semi-restricted carbonate environments fall between the two extremes. The Belize lagoon has sufficient circulation and water runoff from adjacent highlands to produce an environment of terrigenous muds grading seaward into calcareous mud derived from the reef tract. The seaward lagoon has steep sided pinnacle reefs and micro atolls. The inner part of the broad shelf of central Venezuela and the Bahama bank west of Andros Island have pellet deposits characteristic of a restricted environment, but circulation does occur and benthic fauna is normal. Higher energy, winnowed sediments accumulate as the bottom depths approach wave base in these areas.

Submarine Canyons

Submarine canyons are common on continental shelves and slopes, and are generally continuous over both although some canyons start over the slope or near the shelf break. They are found on both convergent and divergent margins. Because canyons may cross both shelf and slope, the placement of their discussion is a problem. The morphology of canyons and their origin and the sediment pattern of the upper canyon are discussed in this chapter. The turbidites of the lower canyon, abyssal fans and continental rise are discussed in Chapter 8, Deep Sea Sediments and Paleoceanography.

Types of Marine Canyons

Just as land valleys are formed by various processes, the valleys of the sea floor appear to have had several origins, producing distinctive types. Shepard & Dill, 1966 Submarine canyons are steep-walled, winding valleys, with V-shaped cross sections, and axes sloping outward and downward as in a river valley, resembling the canyons found cutting into continental landmasses. They may have numerous tributaries entering from both sides, and relief comparable to major land canyons. Cross sections of Scripps Submarine Canyon and the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River have been used in many books to show the comparable size.

Fault valleys are trough-shaped, broad valleys that follow structural trends, and they have few if any tributaries. These occur in areas of tectonic activity. Their trends may be a continuation of structural features from land such as the San Clemente Rift Valley, off southern California and the Manzanares Canyon off Cumana, Venezuela which follow major faults seaward. As in the case of river valleys following fault traces on land, these submarine valleys may develop into and be a part of submarine canyon systems.

Glacial troughs on the shelf and upper slope may also develop into submarine canyons. These are U-shaped and usually have greater depths than other valleys and rather large closed basins along their lengths. They may have both tributaries and distributaries. An example is the trough coming out of the Gulf of St. Lawrence that extends across the shelf.

Delta-front troughs may be related in origin to submarine canyons, but they are located only on the fronts of large deltas and have straight courses with few if any tributaries and a continuously seaward slope across the shelf and down the continental slope. Examples are the Swatch of No Ground off the Ganges Delta and similar valleys off the Indus, Niger, and Mississippi deltas.

Fan valleys are the seaward continuation of submarine canyons and delta front troughs across the sediment fans at the base of the continental slope. These are V-shaped or trough-shaped and are cut into unconsolidated fan sediments. Low ridges comparable to natural levees are found along the sides of many and most have distributaries, but very few have tributaries. It is not possible to classify all marine valleys into one of these categories. Marine valleys of diverse origin may evolve into submarine canyons, so we are confronted with transitional stages. The different types of submarine valleys appear to be relatively distinct one from the other, but there is no evidence that they were all formed by different processes. Nor is there any assurance that all of the same type has the same origin.

Submarine Canyon Origin

The main processes involved in canyon origin include: The resemblance of submarine canyons to river-cut canyons on land and the juxtaposition of many land and sea canyons has always provided a strong argument that at least the heads of the submarine canyons were originally cut by rivers. The dendritic pattern is best developed in the shallow canyon heads, where there can be no doubt that subaerial erosion has taken place during the Pleistocene lowered sea levels. The upper parts of many canyons show episodes of cut and fill which are probably related to sea level changes. Furthermore, various coasts are known to have undergone local subsidence, which would have submerged many upper canyon reaches.

Turbidity currents result from sediment accumulating on the slope or shelf edge until the mass becomes unstable and slumps or is disturbed by an earthquake or storm, throwing the sediments into suspension and developing a heavy, turbid mass which is heavier than adjacent clear water and hence is capable of descending to the bottom of slopes. As this liquid mass of dense material moves down the slope, it may nourish itself by erosion of material over which it flows. Turbidity currents are generally credited with the excavation of submarine canyons and with transporting great quantities of sediment down the canyon to form the fans at the base of the continental slopes.

If a valley were already cut into the slope, the turbidity currents would be confined and hence have a much better chance of continuing to the bottom of the incline. According to this reasoning, the turbidity current is not necessarily the initial cause of the valley, but it might perpetuate a valley already existing on the slope, or even excavate to greater depth. Marine processes are clearly capable of preventing canyons from being filled with sediments.

Hydraulic laboratory experiments suggest high velocities for turbidity currents if they are confined to valleys rather than spreading over the open slope. It has been calculated that the velocities due to the filling of the channels in the Monterey fan valley would be of the order of 16 to 40 knots.

All erosion is probably not due to turbidity currents, and various types of flows may be equally important. Temperature and salinity gradients, along with internal waves and tides are quite capable of producing strong flows that will transport sand sediments. Ordinary bottom water currents which are known to occur in the heads of canyons may also excavate sediments in submarine canyons, or at least build the submarine fans and keep the fan-valleys open. A turbidity current might be expected to come to an end due to loss of sediment at the base of the steep gradient, but the ordinary currents, not dependent on slope, could persist. Erosion by ordinary currents could account for the tributaries that start at considerable depth on the slope at points where little if any sediment would be available to account for a turbidity current.

If processes on the sea floor are both excavating and maintaining previously excavated canyons, undoubtedly deposition on the adjacent shelves and continental slopes is taking place and increasing the total wall heights of the canyons. Downcutting with upbuilding over a long period of time allows the formation of huge canyons, such as those in the Bering Sea and in the Bahamas. Discovery of old filled canyons lying below the floor of present canyons adds impetus to the hypothesis and suggests that canyon cutting may have alternated with fill at different episodes.

Results from canyon studies favor a combination of processes as causal. Perhaps gravity-induced slides and slumps are not important except in the steeper heads, but seismic profiling shows us that slides take place even on gentle continental rises. At most of the locations where creep is demonstrated, there are steep axial slopes, commonly 20 to 30 degrees. Creep explains erosion at a point in the canyon where turbidity currents could not play an important role, because they would not have had time and distance of travel to gather momentum sufficient to resuspend the sediments. Once initiated along a plane of weakness, very little energy is required to maintain a slow downslope creep by large sedimentary masses on even very low slopes, especially if there is a possibility of increasing the pore pressures in the sediment.